WirelessWeek.com

Log in | Register
<!-- Insert your title here -->

Daily news and top headlines for wireless professionals

FREE Email Newsletter View Sample »

  

AT&T Slaps 4G Label on HSPA+, LTE

Posted In: AT&T | T-Mobile | 4G | LTE | Wireless Networks | HSPA | FirstNews


Loading...

This story has been corrected to cite the ITU, not the 3GPP, as the source of the changed definition for 4G services.

AT&T has joined T-Mobile USA in marketing its HSPA+ services as 4G as it works to convince consumers it has competitive mobile broadband services amid LTE and WiMAX rollouts from Verizon and Sprint.

AT&T used the term "4G" to refer to both HSPA+ and LTE in an announcement about its network deployment plans yesterday, and said it would launch 20 new "4G capable" devices this year.

John Stankey, president and CEO of AT&T's business solutions, told attendees of an investment conference yesterday that the carrier's marketing was justified by a recent decision from the International Telecommunication Union (ITU) that loosened the definition of what constituted 4G services.

When asked about AT&T's decision to call HSPA+ a 4G service, Stankey said the ITU now defined 4G as services that offer higher speeds than previous generations of technology, as opposed to service that belong to a specific technology family such as LTE.

"In that classification, HSPA+ and the faster speeds that it offers falls into the 4G category of their classification," Stankey said. "That is our first foray into 4G capabilities."

T-Mobile's decision to market its HSPA+ services as 4G riled Sprint, Clearwire and Verizon, which have spent billions of dollars building out their respective WiMAX and LTE networks.


Join the Discussion
Rate Article:  Average 4.5 out of 5
register or log in to comment on this article!

1 Comments

  • And so the obfuscation of terminology continues forcing the public to educate themselves on the differences. This is akin to false and misleading advertising. The concept that "my 4G" is equal to "your 4G" is not true if they use different protocols, spectrum and radios!

    The 3GPP should recant themselves or enforce better distinction. Marketing departments should not be allowed to distort the definition of these classifications. It confuses the marketplace. The general public thinks they are comparing apples to apples, when in reality they are comparing figs to watermelons.

Add Comment

Text Only 2000 character limit

Page 1 of 1

Loading...
Latest Cell Phone Accessories,
Batteries, Covers, and Cases
with Free shipping!


The #1 Source for cell phone accessories
And the largest iPhone Case selection online

  
Times They Are a-Changin’

Times They Are a-Changin’

With Google officially taking over control of Motorola Mobility and installing its own Google-branded leadership, one era ends and another begins.


CTIA Wireless 2012 and the Comeback Kids

CTIA Wireless 2012 and the Comeback Kids

New Orleans proved the perfect city for CTIA Wireless 2012.


Spectrum Warehousing: Were They or Weren't They?

Spectrum Warehousing: Were They or Weren't They?

Did SpectrumCo ever intend to build a wireless network? Or were they really planning to sit on the airwaves until they came immensely valuable?


Where’s the Money?

Where’s the Money?

If you’re not Apple or Google, who are you?


The Absuridty of 4G Is Upon Us

The Absuridty of 4G Is Upon Us

Why aren’t more people complaining about the absurdity of AT&T passing off its 3 to 5 Mbps HSPA+ network as "4G," when LTE can and does hit 12, even 16 Mbps regularly?


Loading...
<!-- Insert your title here -->

Free Wireless Industry
Subscriptions

Magazine

wireless week

Newsletters

newsletters

Sign up now ►

Top Stories and Headlines
EVERY DAY!

Free Email Newsletter